For state education agencies

AI literacy for every student in your state.

Xyplor is built for statewide deployment. ESSA Title IV-A aligned, COPPA and FERPA-aligned, designed to support state AI literacy frameworks and equity priorities. Multi-LEA state contracts welcomed.

State MSAs · LEA service orders · DPA + SDPC NDPA support

States are setting AI literacy expectations.
Xyplor helps you meet them.

More than a dozen states have published AI literacy frameworks or guidance since 2024. Your students need a platform purpose-built to translate that policy into classroom practice.

Framework alignment

Activities map to published state AI literacy frameworks, ISTE Standards, and CSTA AI/ML strands. New state frameworks: we welcome early consultation.

Statewide scale

SaaS delivery, browser-based, runs on existing Chromebooks. No on-premise infrastructure. Single state MSA covers participating LEAs across the state.

Funding-ready

ESSA Title IV-A documentation provided. ESSER residual planning supported. Per-seat licensing simplifies LEA-level budgeting and reporting.

Equity by design

Same per-seat pricing for small rural LEAs and large urban districts. No coding prerequisite. Subsidized-access agreements available for lower-resourced districts.

Privacy at the state level

SDPC NDPA-compatible. State-specific DPA addenda supported. US data residency. No selling of student data. No use of student content for AI training.

Open pedagogical record

Our pedagogical model is publicly documented (CC BY 4.0). Researchers and policy-makers welcome to evaluate, critique, and co-design evaluation protocols.

Three ways to engage

From informational briefing to full state MSA.

1

Informational briefing

A 30-minute call with the founder. Walkthrough of the platform, pedagogical model, compliance posture, and how Xyplor maps to your state's AI priorities.

2

Multi-LEA pilot

A 1-2 semester pilot covering a small cluster of LEAs. Reduced first-year pricing. Weekly office hours. Optional research partnership for evaluation design.

3

State MSA

Full master service agreement with LEA-level service orders. Consolidated billing or per-LEA invoicing. State-level usage and equity dashboard.

What state procurement teams ask, answered up-front

COPPA-aligned (under 13)
FERPA-aligned in design
State DPA + SDPC NDPA support
California SOPIPA disclosures
US data residency
Encrypted in transit (TLS) and at rest
No selling of student data, ever
No third-party advertising
No student content used for AI training
Data export and deletion on demand
ISTE + CSTA standards alignment
State AI literacy framework mapping
ESSA Title IV-A alignment documentation
Multi-LEA state agreement support

All compliance claims are contractual; your state's general counsel and chief privacy officer should review the DPA and applicable addenda before deployment. We negotiate state-specific terms in good faith and welcome legal review.

Frequently asked questions

How does Xyplor support statewide AI literacy initiatives?
Xyplor is purpose-built for K-12 AI literacy at scale. The platform is delivered SaaS, requires no on-premise infrastructure, runs on any browser including Chromebooks, and licenses by enrolled student. State agencies can deploy a single agreement covering multiple LEAs (school districts) with consolidated billing, unified data privacy terms, and a state-level usage dashboard.
Is Xyplor eligible for ESSA Title IV-A funding?
ESSA Title IV-A (Student Support and Academic Enrichment Grants) explicitly funds 'effective use of technology' and 'well-rounded education' — both of which AI literacy squarely fits. Title IV-A determinations are made at the LEA level. Xyplor provides alignment documentation; each district's federal programs office makes the final eligibility determination. We also support ESSER residual planning for AI-readiness initiatives.
What evidence base supports Xyplor?
Xyplor is in early deployment (2026). We do not yet claim ESSA tiered evidence (Tier I-IV). We are partnering with research universities to design longitudinal studies measuring AI fluency development, persistence, and transfer effects. SEAs interested in co-designing evaluation protocols are encouraged to contact us. Our pedagogical model is described in 'Teaching Kids to Direct AI: Four Mechanisms We Built Into Xyplor' on xyplor.org/blog.
What state AI literacy frameworks does Xyplor align with?
We map activities to published state AI literacy frameworks (e.g., California's AI Literacy Framework, Oregon's AI guidance, North Carolina's AI use guidance) on request. We also map to ISTE Standards for Students and CSTA K-12 Computer Science Standards in the AI/ML strand. State agencies issuing new frameworks: we welcome early consultation to ensure alignment.
How is student data handled at the state level?
Student data is encrypted in transit and at rest. Xyplor does not sell student data, does not display third-party advertising, and does not use student content to train AI models. We provide a Data Privacy Agreement (DPA) and sign state-specific data privacy addenda including SDPC NDPA and California SOPIPA disclosures. Data residency in US-based infrastructure (Vercel / AWS regions). Data export and deletion supported on demand.
How does Xyplor advance equity?
Three ways. (1) No prior coding required — students with no tech background can start in minutes. (2) Browser-based — works on existing Chromebooks and any device, no app installs. (3) Volume pricing scales with enrollment — small rural LEAs and large urban districts pay the same per-student rate. Multi-language UI is on the roadmap. We can structure agreements to subsidize access in lower-resourced districts.
Can Xyplor be deployed across multiple school districts via a state contract?
Yes. State-level master service agreements (MSAs) with LEA-level participation are supported. We can issue per-LEA service orders against a single state agreement, consolidate billing or invoice each LEA separately, and provide a state-level dashboard showing aggregate usage, equity metrics, and outcome indicators across participating LEAs.
What is Xyplor's pedagogical position on AI in education?
Our position: kids must learn to *direct* AI, not be replaced by it. We teach four core skills — describing intent in natural language, evaluating AI output, iterating with specific feedback, and exercising judgment about what to use. These transfer to every AI-augmented context students will encounter. We do not promote AI as a homework-doer or ghostwriter; AI conversations are parent and educator visible by design.
How do state agencies engage with Xyplor?
Three pathways: (1) An information call with the founder to discuss your state's AI priorities. (2) A pilot agreement covering a small set of LEAs to validate fit. (3) A full state-level MSA. We are actively in conversations with state AI advisory groups and are happy to brief working groups, attend SEA convenings, or provide written input to state AI strategy documents.
Who is behind Xyplor?
Xyplor was founded by Vinay Abburi, a technology and engineering leader with experience scaling B2B and consumer technology. Xyplor is independent (not subsidiary or platform-owned). Our pedagogical thinking is publicly documented and CC BY 4.0 licensed at xyplor.org/blog. We engage transparently with educators, researchers, and policy-makers shaping the AI-in-education conversation.

Brief us on your state's AI priorities

We engage transparently with state AI working groups, advisory committees, and SEA leadership. Happy to attend convenings, provide written input, or co-design evaluation protocols.

Email partnerships@xyplor.com →